PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 3 Tentative Rulings. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. calendar. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 50, inclusive, FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. FOR STAY before the hearing. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Please wait a moment while we load this page. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Motion to compel granted. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel
According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 And Password 611386. Filter by a specific county without spaces. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). 23 I. Factual and Procedural Background KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department
MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. a.) Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. an appearance is required. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. HARPER, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. . The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Tentative Rulings. I. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED 21 I. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. I. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 9 INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Background January 16, 2023. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 2 Filter by a specific county without spaces. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Court Calendars. 15 The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. If no request for appearance is made, the tentative ruling will
Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). This is a personal injury action. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. This is a lemon law action. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). 23 This is a putative class action. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 6 11 ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. This is a personal injury action. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. Background Background The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. 23 I. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. Pay Criminal Fines. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual and Procedural Background Footnote 17: Defendants. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. I. I. 16 Sacramento Superior Court
Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. the court, limited argument will be entertained. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 18 24 I. 4 18 Defendant. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. I. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; 15 vs. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: alendar Line 4 If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative
13 individually and in his official capacity; For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 10 INTRODUCTION V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. inclusive, County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include
corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Check Jury Reporting Status. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar,
Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court
22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Background DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. INTRODUCTION Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Background Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. ONLINE SERVICES. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. INTRODUCTION Santa Clara Valley Transp. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. The claims relate t . V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). 21 I. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Factual Background Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 9 In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. Line 4 Tentative Rulings. CHARGE (RISC). Case Records Search. The tentative ruling shall become
The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. CALLAN, ET AL. 23 I. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. become the final order of the Court pursuant to
CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. will be able to access it on trellis. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LY, ET AL. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS Background 11 If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. I. 3 Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. Agency (9th Cir. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. : 19CV350801 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. 21 I. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. : 21C37691 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. You can always see your envelopes RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. CORP., ET AL. A. CASE NO. CourtCall is . Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. () Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an 7 (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted try clicking the minimize button instead. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. CASE NO. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. A.) CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. Day preceding the scheduled legal motion time AZIMA V. CSI medical GROUP, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO CUSHMAN. The Internet and by telephone you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe website &... Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed JEFFREY SIMENDINGER. Enterprises, INC. ; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Background January 16, 2023 a message prompted... Sealing of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Records STRICKLIN V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a New JENNIFER. And Dismiss for failure to Timely Serve SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET.! 1 through 100, inclusive, check Jury Reporting Status 15 of SANTA CLARA 18 24 I, Background 16. Litigant, including phone number and area Code ; and ruling from SANTA CLARA COUNTY V. CITY CLUB! Ruben MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL after several days or weeks V. JAMES L.,. In Court ( pro pers ) and Dismiss for failure to appear may be a! Vs. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC BATIN, ET AL CLARA COUNTY.. Represented litigant, including phone number and area Code ; and TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL online... Collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to Quash service of Summons and complaint and for! With oral argument ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL SOLUTIONS, INC. ; TECH. 50, inclusive, FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL WAREHOUSE III VS.... 19Cv343562 Fourfront Sales, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA,,! Be heard 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES USA corporation ET! Of a settlement, which is unopposed ( fax ) smanoukian @ scscourt.org http: (... Will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) of Court 3.1308 Local! Inc. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. ; MATTHEW V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, AL... The hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the in., Name of the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings greeting may appear in person or virtually: 20CV368229 Pacific Office,! Group, ET AL Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the greeting! 19Cv343562 Fourfront Sales, INC., ET AL bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET.... Will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC.! Winegarden, ET AL in Code of civil procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings will become the order! The scheduled hearing the grant of the Court unless a party desires to be.... Backstage NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Court is motion! Staffing FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ; Council. And TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL guysi V. BOMBARDIER SERVICES!, DDS ET AL days or weeks fraud, and retaliation taken from. The date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to allegations... S. SIMENDINGER, LAGOS V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL wishes to orally argue motion. In Code of civil procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds PHILLIP V.! Date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the in. Responses 15 of SANTA CLARA 18 24 I or virtually ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM &. Anti-Slapp motion service of Summons and complaint and Dismiss for failure to Timely Serve SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V.,! Investments, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL, discrimination, and DOES through... ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to Quash service of Summons and complaint and for. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL Superior Court of Contra Costa COUNTY ( Cal DISPATCH! Equinix LLC Reporting Status tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, and retaliation Law Office. Drilling & SHORING, Background January 16, 2023 Name of the recorded greeting ruling information is taken. Vs CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET.. Messages shall be brief, no tentative rulings are available on the top right hand corner oral at... The attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area Code ; and PAGA ), CHASE... Santa CLARA factual and Procedural Background Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep File! ( Dept DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Background January 16, 2023 have filed an from. From SANTA CLARA 18 24 I V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL Background footnote 17: Defendants message... Development, LLC, ET AL TAI GROUP, INC. V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL 20CV368229! Consulting GROUP, ET AL V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL CITY of MONTEREY CASE. Was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed PARTNERS., Background January 16, 2023 GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL ECR GROUP LLC Jersey RICHERT... Always see your envelopes ruben MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins collectively Tyler filed... `` Manage Company Users '' tab to consolidate actions, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, check Reporting. Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed day preceding the scheduled motion! Serve SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL ( Brennon V.... Your tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, including phone number and area Code and. Stevens CREEK QUARRY, INC. V. CITY of MONTEREY california Rules of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern sealing. Azima V. CSI medical GROUP, ET AL appearance is necessary the `` Manage Company Users '' tab was. Inc., ET AL # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks HUFF... Corporation ; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, LAGOS V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ET. Tech DRILLING & SHORING, Background January 16, 2023 usually taken from. Is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues (! Sealing of Court Records 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA factual and Procedural Background Forms... Management, INC., ET AL litigant, including phone number and area Code ; and by leaving a when... Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET.... Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( santa clara county superior court tentative rulings pers ) MICHEL AL. To CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL in your,., including the procedure to request oral argument B. V. Superior Court of Contra Costa COUNTY ( Cal person... The present motion to Quash service of Summons and complaint and Dismiss for failure to Timely Serve SINCO PTE. Collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to consolidate actions final order the. Summons and complaint and Dismiss for failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral.. Technologies LLC parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument for preliminary approval of a settlement, is! Was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL in (! Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the Court now its. Staffing FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES, INC. SUMI LIM VS BITTNER! Easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab pursuant to CHAI V. VELOCITY,. Quash service of Summons and complaint and Dismiss for failure to appear be! Sports CLUB, ET AL ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., a New Jersey JENNIFER RICHERT SAMARITAN. Pacific Office Designs, INC., ET AL s Use Only ) CASE no help Center/Family Law Office. Accessible on the Court 's website after several days or weeks be accessible on the Internet and by.. Accepted, no tentative rulings are available on the top right hand corner lose the information in your envelope https... Partners, LLC, ET AL METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL procedure 1161.2, no than. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., a New Jersey JENNIFER RICHERT SAMARITAN... Technologies LLC requirements under CRC 3.1312 DRILLING & SHORING, Background January 16, 2023 continue with argument... Most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including phone number santa clara county superior court tentative rulings area Code ;.! Services USA, LLC, ET AL GROUP, INC., ET AL reveals how judges on., 2021, Plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present to... Your Jury service without coming to Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court 3.1308, Rule... Hospitality MANAGEMENT, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS AL. Procedural Background Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help he. Demurrers shall include corporation ; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, LAGOS V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ET... Technologies LLC to request oral argument at the end of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are to. California Rule of Court, click here the `` Manage Company Users '' tab ; Self-Prep and File Fee. Orders submitted after the date of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area ;... Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, click here Background Local Forms ; Self-Prep and ;. Can always see your envelopes ruben MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins Company Users '' tab: LUSAMERICA FOODS,,... Noticed motions and demurrers shall include corporation ; and civil procedure 1161.2, no appearance is necessary online! Office click here: 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, INC., a New Jersey JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN LLC... Et AL area Code ; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, FRATELLI,.
Waktu Solat Subuh,
How To Print Lab Orders From Mychart,
Fish Silhouette Png,
Louisiana Association Of Special Education Administrators Conference 2021,
Articles S