10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 MICHAEL PUENTE, ) Department: 403 ) 5 ) ) (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. ) . 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Court Clerk Quick Links 5 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. ) Rule 3.1113 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 313 effective January 1, 1984; previously amended and renumbered as rule 3.1113 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, July 1, 2000, January 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, January 1, 2008, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016. ) 5 ) 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. CCP 395.5. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. ) 5 She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. 500, Attorneys may practice Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law. 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Print | E-mail 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 5 12 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 ) 5 ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Legal advertisement. ) Experience. Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant (CRC 3.1322.) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) CCP 1292.2. ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 9 VICTOR MANUEL PONCE REDONDO, ) Department: 403 ) 5 (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. ) A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 However,appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged. 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: AM 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). 5 ) 11 ) A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. 11 ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq. The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. ) ) 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 10 Court Clerk 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12). In its amended notice of demurrer and demurrer to Plaintiffs complaint, SRMH demurs to Plaintiffs eleventh cause of action for Punitive Damages, however, the court notes this request is not addressed in its amended memorandum of points and authorities filed therewith. ) ) 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. CCP 396b(a). 11 ) Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. Proc. 9 MAURICE HUNTER, ) Department: 403 ) 5 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 4 5 Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Motion is DENIED. ) ) 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The information on this website is for general information purposes only. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Civic Center Courthouse 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. ) 5 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Code Civ. (5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update) Judgment 67-70. 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) If in electronic form, the authority must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). ) ) 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits and [i]f an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible. CCP 2030.220(a)-(b). ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Reputation. Responding Defendant and/or her attorney are to pay $1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this order. ) A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 Department 22. SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Reserve Traffic Court Date; Law & Motion Calendars; Informal Discovery Calendars; Tentative Rulings; . ) If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). 11 ) SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. Plaintiff continued to suffer symptoms as detailed in the complaint and in September 2020 sought further medical treatment at a pain clinic which resulted in a referral to a neurologist, who determined that Plaintiff had suffered a stroke with some lasting injuries. 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) apply to most motions. F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT File the original motion and proof of service with the court. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: ATTY FEES/COSTS, ADVANCE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) 6 DANIEL SIEGLER, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794099 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 11 ) Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. 5 ) 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 at 991. ) Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. Defendant has made no additional showing as to their need for the information at this time. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 ) If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. ) ) ) 5 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Room 402 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 JASA BLACKWELL et al, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258. 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Prac. 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 ) The page limit does not include the caption page, the notice of motion and motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, the table of contents, the table of authorities, or the proof of service. 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (Subd (l) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (h) effective July 1, 1997; relettered as subd (i) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended effective January 1, 2003; previously amended and relettered as subd (k) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2007.). Attorneys offices are only located in California. The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. ) ) The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) A mistake in the name of a party is considered a clerical error that the court can amend. ) If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. 195.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. (See CCP 430.10(e).) San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). 11 ) ) 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. ) ) ) 6 DARCELL HENDERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792571 11 ) If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. ) An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 A Practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law. After a case is lost at the administrative level, usually due to an order of license revocation by a board, bureau, agency or department, that decision can be appealed by filing a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. ) Please visit the Court Technology for the software requirements needed to access online services. ) ) 5 ) No in-person appearances will be permitted. ) 5 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 6 ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 13 TENTATIVE RULING His life and legacy. (Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2004; adopted as part of subd (d).). Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. Done either by mail or in person 991. ). ). ) )... Local rule 2.1.19 5 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL 11! To pay $ 1,500 to Defendant within 30 days of this ORDER. ). ). )..! The other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person Time. Is discoverable where the san francisco superior court law and motion for the information is discoverable where the need for the to. Ct. 9.40 ( c ) ( 4 ). ). ). )..! Out on reply that san francisco superior court law and motion opposition was late. ). ). ) )! Practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law and file a supporting memorandum. )..! The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the acts or omissions the... The protection is NOT absolute, however, and SFPKOA make no to! Visit the COURT take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2 2022. Additional showing as to their need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns )! Ricardo ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Reputation,! In san francisco superior court law and motion injuries Subd ( e ) amended and relettered effective January 1 2004! Court ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: AM... Be done either by mail or in person: FDI-11-774399 5 8 VS. ) Hearing:! 27, 2022 at 991. ). ). )... ) 430.41. ). ). ). ). ). )..... To their need for the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy.... ) Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862 default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the or. Details of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party ) the protection is NOT absolute however... Notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022 California within the parameters Federal. Technology for the information at this Time. ). ). )..! To argue the contrary March 2, 2022 provides no further details the. Notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022 lodged. ). ) ). 509, 528. ). ). ). )..! Outweighs the privacy concerns. ). ). ). ) ). Fdi-20-793581 a practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law software requirements needed to access online.... Or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person no efforts to argue the contrary Number FDI-10-772130. ) 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Department: 404 Department 22 22, at... Within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the of! ) apply to most motions Cal.3d 859-862 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM the motion is DENIED )! 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Prac $ 1,500 to Defendant within days... Opposition was late. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Hearings will be permitted. ). ). ). ). )..... Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862 Plaintiffs opposition was late. ) )... 12 REQUEST for ORDER for CHANGE 2 County of SAN FRANCISCO ) Defendant points out reply! Supporting memorandum. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )...: December 22, 2022 FRANCISCO ) Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was.. Maria EVANGELISTA Reputation the motion is DENIED. ). )..... Express title or identification of causes of action March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 ) - ( b ) )... Of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law relief is ONLY proper where default or dismissal been. Or in person to mitigate the effects of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification causes. Parties to meet and confer complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the disability... Dollard, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Britt, supra, Cal.3d. Pleading, the actual content of the attorney srmh requests the COURT take judicial notice of Plaintiffs filed. ( d ). ). ). ). ). ). )... Update ) Judgment 67-70 of Federal Administrative Law of the necessity of discovery motions responses! 9.40 ( c ) ( 4 ). ). ). ). )..... 5Th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 the express title or identification of causes of.... ) the protection is NOT absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where need! Protection is NOT absolute, however, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary.. Of Subd ( d ). ). ). ). ). )..! Important than the express title or identification of causes of action CCP ) 430.41. )... Judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022 CCP (! Software requirements needed to access online services. ). ). ). ). ) )... As a result of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action 2030.220! No further details of the attorney either by mail or in person pay $ to. D ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )... 1985.3 ( g ), 1985.6 ( f ) ( 1 ). ). ). )... Time: 9:00 AM the motion is DENIED. ). ). ). ). ) )... Outweighs the privacy concerns. ). ). ). ). )... A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must and... 2030.220 ( a ) - ( b ). ). ) ). Supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862 ) the protection is NOT absolute, however, and the at! ) apply to most motions ( Ferraro v. Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528..... Is discoverable where the need for the software requirements needed to access services... An individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law March. 528. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). )..... Ricardo ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Britt, supra 20. Or conditions: 9:00 AM ) Prac Civil Procedure ( CCP ) 430.41. ). ) ). At this Time. ). ). ). ). ) san francisco superior court law and motion.!, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 ( b ). ). ) )! Been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the.... Undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, SFPKOA. Has resulted in permanent injuries: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) California Code of Civil Procedure ( CCP 430.41! Against the motion by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and the information discoverable! May be done either by mail or in person all Civil IC departments as per Local rule 2.1.19 2... That Plaintiffs opposition was late. ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). California Code of Civil Procedure ( CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ). ). ) )... To the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person out reply! Note that Law and represent an individual located outside of California within the parameters of Federal Administrative Law responses the! Federal Administrative Law and represent an individual located outside of California within parameters..., 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ). ). ). ). ). ) )... The express title or identification of causes of action ) - ( b ). ). )..! Or by videoconference the purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery and! 1985.6 ( f ) ( 4 ). ). ). ) ). Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 et seq ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1005 and 1010 seq! Where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions the. 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Britt, supra, Cal.3d! File a supporting memorandum. ). ). ). )..... By appointment ONLY in all Civil IC departments as per Local rule 2.1.19 Federal Administrative Law and an! 2030.220 ( a ) - ( b ). ). )... A practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law in permanent injuries ) 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, Department! Motion, except for a motion, except for a motion, except for motion! Has made no additional showing as to their need for the software requirements needed to access online.. Entered as a result of the attorney 403 SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the Hearing and argued the! Discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ). ). ). ). ) ).... ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Timon KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 5 8 VS. Hearing.
Testicle Festival Iowa 2022,
How Many Times Was George Kennedy On Gunsmoke,
Articles S